Friday, December 6, 2019

7 Eleven Inquiry In Australia Free Samples †

Question: Discuss about the 7 Eleven Inquiry In Australia. Answer: Introduction: In Australia, 7 Eleven is one of the most popular names in the petrol and convenience sector. The origin of the company is 7 Eleven Inc. that is situated in the continent of United States. The company had opened the store in Australia in the year 1977. By 2015, the company had opened more than 626 stores in Australia (Sivaraman Turner, 2016). The number of franchise owner in the various parts of Australia has reached 442 and the quantity of transaction done by the company annually is approximately 185 million. In the year 2008, an allegation was made against the company is that the company conducted certain double hour scam, where the employees are not properly getting their wages and falsify the employment records by misappropriating their posts in the market of Australia (Settle, Cameron Thornton, 2014). An inquiry has been made by the Fair Work Ombudsman in the year 2014 to point out the truthfulness of the allegation and made certain observations regarding the same. It was obse rved from the inquiry that the company had involved into waging scam. The FWO had inquired several stores of the company. The impacts of the inquiry were long lasting and important in nature. In the words of Lorelle Frazer, every franchisee company owes certain statutory duties that should not be violated at any cost. The inquiry has also created effects on the Australian society in certain circumstances. The Inquiry: In the year 2008, several allegations were made against the leading convenience company regarding the disputed waging system and employment records in various stores of the company and the company regarding the migrated employees made allegations regarding discrimination. In 2014, an inquiry was made by the Fair Works Ombudsman to identify the problems occurred in the branches of the company and near about 20 stores were being examined by the FWO during the process. It was come into the light that the company had violated the rules of Fair Work Act and breached certain duties while performing their duty. The Ombudsman had published certain reports on the same. There are certain reasons behind holding the inquiry. The Ombudsman as to identify the companys non-compliance regarding the workplace has made an attempt. An initiative has been made regarding the companys payroll and auditing section. It was found that the company has failed to comply with the regime of the Fair Works Act and failed to detect the non-compliances. Therefore, a complex situation arose and the company had started to underpay the employees. There are sections mentioned under the Fair Work Act and Fair Work Regulation against underpayment. Therefore, the company had violated the rules regarding the same. In 2008, an audit had been published by the workplace Ombudsman regarding the allegations from an unregistered organisation working for the interest of the employees. It was alleged that the company is paying its employees certain amount that are half in nature and therefore, the employees are facing the under waging problem. In the year 2009, it was revealed from the report made by the Fair Work Ombudsman that the company had reduced the rates for the night shift works. In the year 2010, an education campaign was conducted and it was revealed that the young employees are facing much trouble in the company. More than 70% of the audits are disputed in nature and contradictory to the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Ombudsman examined two operators of the company and the truthfulness regarding the allegation was proved. It was found that the company had failed to pay the casual rate to many of its employees. There were no continuity regarding the record keeping system and the company had failed to maintain all the employment records. The company had not engaged any inspector who can inspect the situation regarding the employment relation. The inquiry had also revealed that 60% of the franchisee owners of the company are novice and they had no particular knowledge on the matter. They also had little knowledge about the Industry Relation System of Australia. Finding report regarding the companys work force was also shocking in nature. Most of the employees had non-English background and the migrated employees had to do overtime in the company but there were no pay hike regarding the same. A request had been made before the Ombudsman to secure the life and interest of every employee who are facing the waging problems. There was an inconsistency found in the penalty rates and pay rates. The records maintained by the company were insufficient and that are not being matched with the CCTV footage of the stores. It was revealed by the inspector that the pattern of work maintained by the company was not according to the rules of the Fair Works Act 2009. The persons who are working at night, not being tracked by the CCTV of the company and the respective stores. There has been a manipulation observed regarding the payroll system in the company. Another major finding of the inquiry is to disclose the facts that the company had not maintained the proper data system. There is a mismatch regarding the penalty hours and the penalty records observed during the inquiry. There are certain penalties present in the company and the penalty hours are also different. However, the company was not maintaining the records regarding the same in a proper way. Gaps in the Australian Employment Relation System: The Employment Relation denotes the relationship between the employee and employer. In this relationship, certain reciprocal rights are generated in between the employer and employees. The employees are getting the benefits and social security by the acts of the employer. Under the employment relationship system, rights and obligations of the employers are being mentioned. The workers or the employees can be of any types, whether migrant workers or the private employees. The scope of the employment relationship has been confirmed in the year 2003. Under the Employment Relation, every employee is doing their works for remuneration and for certain fees. The primary object of the employment relation is to protect the interest of the workers. It is a fact that if there is any laxity regarding the labour protection has arose, the outcome can be adverse to the families of the employees. There are certain gaps observed in the process of the employment relations in these years. A number of allegations are made against the employers and rules of the International Labour Organisation and the Fair Work Act has not been maintained properly in this regard. The provision regarding the labour law has been frequent in nature and that leads towards an ambiguity in the employment relations. In Australia, certain problems regarding the employment relations have been cropped up and the effects of the same is detrimental in nature. The rule under the employment law is that a person can be recruited without any fixed period, but there are certain conditions have to be followed. Those employees are entitled to get certain pecuniary benefits as against the same. It is the duty of an employer not to discriminate the workers over their remuneration and fees. If they are eligible to get certain benefits or over time fees, they should be get the same from the employers. The primary objective of the employment relationship is to secure the interest of the employees. Therefore, any intention to manipulate the workers are to be taken, that will affect the rights and interest of the workers a lot. Certain employment gaps are found in the industrial society of Australia during the inquiry made at the several stores of the 7 eleven and identify the positions of the industrial organisation regarding the employment relation. It has been observed by the inquiry that the company has violated various principles of the Fair Work Act and had not maintained the provisions of the Employment Relationship properly. There were many allegations made against the company regarding the non-payment of wages to the workers. In the company, many migrated workers were working and they often had to work at night. After the inquiry some information were came into light regarding the company and therefore, a gap has been noticed regarding the employment relations. The primary objective of the ER system has been violated by the acts of the company. There was laxity observed regarding the interest of the workers. The provisions of the remuneration were also not according to the law or the rule. The company did not maintain the payroll records and there was a mismatch happened regarding the CCTV footage and the payroll records. Many workers were alleged that they were not getting proper fees for the night shifts or over time. Even there was no footage regarding the night shift duties. Therefore, it can be seen that the company was engaged into the serious mischief regarding the employment relation by non-compliance of the rules. Implication of the Inquiry: Certain things have been come into the light through the inquiry and a huge gap has been observed regarding the Employment Relation System. There was a lack regarding the compulsory power observed in the company and it resulted into the non-compliance of the rules of the Fair Work Act 2009. The implication of the inquiry has created serious effect not only on the respected company but on the Australian Industry as well. Many articles were published to expose the conditions of the company and the outcome of the inquiry. The Guardian regarding the company had published certain material facts (Briton, 2015). It was reported that the workers who were suffered by the under payment waging system of the company and alleged to made complaint against the company had been brutally beaten up by the company. As per the panel, conducting the investigation, observed that the company is engaged with the underpayment malpractice and the company is bound to pay $4.36m to the workers. The under payment scandal was reported to the Senate employment committee and over 2500 complaint were made to the committee regarding the scam. It was revealed by the committee and a migrated worker was beaten by the company when he tried to make complaint against the company regarding the under waging system. It was reported by the Sydney Morning Herald that two of the employees were paid $270,000 from the company after the investigation was made. These workers were taken key role regarding the exposure. One Mohamed Rashid Thodi had been suffering since 2007 and made a claim regarding the matter. 7 Eleven was the most popular convenience store in Australia and when the scam was came into the light, all the franchisee networks were encouraged by the act. The investigating panel claims certain recommendations regarding the repayment to the affected workers. The main objectives of the inquiry were to promote the sustainable culture among the franchisee of the Australia. The franchisee structure was very much affected by the inquiry of 7 eleven. The franchisee used the employment law as their weapon to cheat the people or the workers at large. They are not following the rules of the Fair Work Act 2009. 7 eleven is a less typical arrangement. The employee relation surfaces are vehemently affected by the acts of the franchisee in Australia. The investigators were suddenly raid on the stores of the 7 eleven and exposes certain shocking facts that shows the real face behind the mask. The payroll services are not maintained properly and the company was using the same to gain certain illegal process to cheat the migrated workers at large. The audit system of the company has also certain loopholes and there was no such record present that can be regarded as proper as there were lots of gap between the record and the practical life. The loopholes are basically founded as the form of an under payment. Certain training was necessitated regarding the same of wages and the violation of the employees. It can be stated that the inquiry made by the fair work inspector are creating certain implications not only on the company but on the Australian franchisee system. It can be observed by the statements of the various workers that who are working in the same company. According to Mr. Mohamed Shahid, the company had not made his payment since the year 2007. After the inquiry, Mohamed get all the money that were engaged in the company. Therefore, it can be said that the company report had certain implication on the Australia based convenience store 7 Eleven. Conclusion: Therefore, from the above discussion, it can be stated that the inquiry made by the Fair Work authority in Australia has been regarded as one of the major step to curb the problem regarding the Australian franchisee system. The inquiry had made certain specific rule regarding the under payment of wages. References: Abdu, G. (2013). Analysis of consumer behavior affecting consumer willingness to buy in 7-eleven convenience store.Universal Journal of Management,1(2), 69-75. Bray, J. R. (2013). Reflections on the Evolution of the Minimum Wage in Australia: Options for the Future. Briton, B. (2015). 7-Eleven scandal: The tip of a low-wage iceberg.Guardian (Sydney), (1705), 1. Chiao, Y. C., Cheng, K. H., Hsu, S. M. (2013). FamilyMart: Responses to Competitive Rivalry in the Convenience Store Market in Taiwan.Asian Case Research Journal,17(02), 339-358. Chopra, S., Chopra, S. (2017). Seven-Eleven Japan Co.Kellogg School of Management Cases, 1-14. Endo, G. (2014). How Convenience Stores have Changed Retail and Distribution in Thailand?: A Comparative Business History of 7-Eleven Stores in Japan and Thailand. (Japanese Studies Journal),31(1), 87-106. Grasso, M. (2015). The risks of underpayment.Australian Veterinary Journal,93(1), N22. Li, J., Cooke, F. L., Mu, J., Wang, J. (2016). Underpayment of wages and wage distortion in China: an empirical assessment of the 20032008 period.Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy,21(1), 26-52. MORAN, L. J. (2014). CHAPTER ELEVEN MANAGING THE CRITICAL INDEPENDENCIES.Law and Popular Culture: International Perspectives, 195. Pekarek, A., Gahan, P. (2016). Unions and collective bargaining in Australia in 2015.Journal of Industrial Relations,58(3), 356-371. Robertson, S. (2013). Campus, City, Networks and Nation: Student?Migrant Activism as Socio?spatial Experience in Melbourne, Australia.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,37(3), 972-988. Ruff, R. R., Akhund, A., Adjoian, T. (2016). Small convenience stores and the local food environment: an analysis of resident shopping behavior using multilevel modeling.American Journal of Health Promotion,30(3), 172-180. Settle, P. J., Cameron, A. J., Thornton, L. E. (2014). Socioeconomic differences in outdoor food advertising at public transit stops across Melbourne suburbs.Australian and New Zealand journal of public health,38(5), 414-418. Shipp, S. P. (2015). Crisis Communication in an International Organization: An Investigation of the BBCs Reputation in the Aftermath of the Savile Scandal. Sivaraman, G., Turner, P. (2016). The 7-Eleven wages scandal: The need for law reform.Precedent (Sydney, NSW), (135), 53. Sivaraman, G., Turner, P. (2016). The 7-Eleven wages scandal: The need for law reform.Precedent (Sydney, NSW), (135), 53. Wang, J. H. (2014). Key success factor in ready-meal suppliers entering convenience stores.Anthropologist,17(1), 93-99. Webster, J. (2017). More than underpayments and civil penaltiesTaking a strategic approach to regulatory workplace relations litigation.Journal of Industrial Relations, 0022185617705816. Wu, S. I., Lin, H. F. (2014). The correlation of CSR and consumer behavior: A study of convenience store.International Journal of Marketing Studies,6(6), 66. Wu, S. I., Lin, H. F. (2014). The correlation of CSR and consumer behavior: A study of convenience store.International Journal of Marketing Studies,6(6), 66.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.